A podium that still leaves questions

Max Verstappen finished third in Austin and Isack Hadjar sixth. Red Bull therefore brought both cars into the points, but the drivers’ reactions describe a weekend when its potential did not become a sustained victory challenge. That is a different perspective from the finishing order alone. Before Mexico, the team’s question is why its performance became harder to repeat throughout the race rather than simply how many points it collected.

Verstappen questions the tyre choices

In comments published by Formula 1, Verstappen says the order in which Red Bull used its tyres, and possibly the compounds themselves, needs reviewing. He also reports power-unit inconsistency that changed the balance he felt through corners, along with a slow stop. These are the driver’s post-race explanations. They do not identify one publicly confirmed failed component or precisely measure how much time was lost to each separate issue.

Why Hadjar’s race was different

Hadjar describes excessive clutch delivery at the start and later being stuck in a throttle map intended for the pit stop. He was nevertheless pleased with his opening-stint pace on soft tyres. Those observations can coexist: a car may have good stint speed while losing a result through an operating problem. The drivers’ comments do not establish that every difficulty had the same underlying cause, or that the same remedy would address both cars.

Isack Hadjar at the Melbourne Walk during the 2026 Australian Grand Prix
Isack Hadjar at the Melbourne Walk in March 2026. Archive portrait; it does not show his reactions after the Austin race. WebP/AVIF resizing with neutral margins; the portrait frame is retained. Yu Chu Chin / Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Photo source ↗ · Licence

Two strategies and two different races

Red Bull’s report records two stops for Verstappen, while Hadjar extended his opening stint before changing to hard tyres. Max passed Norris late on and then lost second to Leclerc. The team’s account also records engine-braking problems. The table compares starting positions with the result; it does not automatically attribute every lost place to a single strategy choice. The two races need to be assessed on their own terms.

Red Bull at Austin 2026 · grid and result
DriverStartFinishPoints
Max Verstappen2315
Isack Hadjar368

Third in the teams’ championship remains important

The official post-Austin standings place Red Bull third, level with McLaren on 355 points. The published order still matters when totals are equal. Verstappen has 236 drivers’ points, compared with Russell’s 242 and Hamilton’s 241. Subtraction gives gaps of six and five points respectively. A podium therefore has value even on a Sunday when the team believes it could have executed better and left more performance unused.

What to watch in Mexico

The useful markers next time are the quality of the start, the repeatability of the car’s response and tyre selection in the new circuit’s conditions. This is APEX’s reading of the reported problems, without assuming a solution is already ready. One difficult race does not automatically erase earlier progress, but it shows how the result depends on the complete package working together. Red Bull needs speed, strategy and execution to remain connected across an entire Grand Prix.