A new circuit raises the same Red Bull pace question

Max Verstappen arrives at the United States Grand Prix after victories in Malaysia and Singapore, but says that sequence does not establish the Austin order. In comments made on Thursday, 22 October and published by Formula 1, the Red Bull driver connected the recent improvement partly to the conditions in which those races took place. Texas calls for a fresh check: the same car must deliver across a different combination of corners, temperatures and tyre demands.

What Verstappen said about the Asian conditions

Verstappen described the previous two events as very hot and humid, noting that the power unit had performed well in that setting. He expects drier conditions in Austin. This is the driver’s observation about how the car behaved, rather than a published measurement of an engine advantage. His comments do not establish a horsepower figure or a lap-time gain, and they do not mean Red Bull will automatically lose ground.

Why COTA changes the test

Pirelli’s preview provides a concrete reason for caution. The 5.513-kilometre circuit combines rapid changes of direction, high-speed corners and slow exits that demand traction. The supplier identifies substantial front-tyre demands in the opening sector and rear-tyre thermal degradation in the final sector. For Red Bull, a useful question is whether its recently established balance remains effective in both situations, without protecting one axle at the expense of the other.

Max Verstappen’s Red Bull RB22 at Albert Park in 2026
Max Verstappen’s Red Bull RB22 during practice in Melbourne, 6 March 2026. Archive photograph. Cropped and resized to WebP/AVIF; the original licence is retained. Yu Chu Chin / Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Photo source ↗ · Licence

Tyres and the format provide time to find answers

Austin’s allocation is C2 hard, C3 medium and C4 soft. Pirelli explains that the hard compound could support long stints, although temperatures can change the appeal of a one-stop strategy. There are three practice sessions and no Sprint, allowing more comparisons before qualifying. That additional track time matters for set-up work and race simulations. It still does not turn Friday’s fastest lap into a definitive assessment of Sunday’s race pace.

What to compare during Austin practice
ReferenceWhat to watch
Fast lapSingle-attempt pace in the context of tyres and traffic
Long runPace and wear progression across consecutive laps
BalanceHigh-speed response and traction on corner exit

Mekies receives the driver’s backing

In Austin, Verstappen also backed Laurent Mekies’ contract extension, which keeps him as Red Bull CEO and team principal until 2031. He praised the team leader’s work, leadership and the atmosphere within the organisation after a difficult start to the year. The contract had already been announced; the new development is the driver’s response. Management continuity provides a working framework, but it is not evidence that every technical difficulty has been resolved.

APEX analysis: what to watch in practice

The first persuasive signal will be repeatability. A quick lap demonstrates potential on one attempt, whereas a sequence of comparable laps can show whether the driver keeps the tyres under control. Comparisons with rivals become useful when compound, tyre age, traffic and the timing of the run are considered. Fuel loads are not public, so timing-screen gaps need to be read alongside the work programme wherever the teams explain it.

Current progress and the limitations relevant to 2027

Verstappen also pointed to areas Red Bull wants to improve but cannot change during this season. He did not provide a technical list of those limitations. APEX’s interpretation: this distinguishes a team able to win particular races from one competitive across a broad range of circuits. Austin can add evidence about that versatility. The assessment will need updating once the cars have completed their actual running, rather than treating the pre-event comments as a result.